Table 4. Rank order correlations with the proposed "natural order"
_________________________________________________________________________
1. Studies with nine countable grammatical morphemes:
Rank order
Studya correlationb
Marta 0.823
Uguisu 0.170
Dulay and Burt, 1974b-combined 0.770
Dulay and Burt, 1974b-Spanish 0.753
Dulay and Burt, 1974b-Chinese 0.827
Dolores 0.849
Andersen, 1976 0.883
Larsen-Freeman, BSM time I 0.840
Larsen-Freeman, BSM time II 0.857
Larsen-Freeman, Imitation I 0.416
Larsen-Freeman, Imitation II 0.719
Larsen-Freeman, Listen I 0.719
Larsen-Freeman, Listen II 0.606
Larsen-Freeman, Read I 0.130
Larsen-Freeman, Read II -0.130
Larsen-Freeman, Write I 0.217
Larsen-Freeman, Write II 0.148
for n = 9, significance at 0.05 level requires rho = 0.600 or larger.
significance at 0.01 level requires rho = 0.783 or larger.
II. Studies with eight countable grammatical morphemes:
Rank order
Study correlation
Jorge 7 0.878
Jorge 11 0.615
Jorge 18 0.725
Jorge 20 0.886
Dulay and Burt, 1973-Sacramento 0.939
Dulay and Burt, 1973-East Harlem 0.878
Dulay and Burt, 1973-San Ysidro 0.865
Bailey, Madden, and Krashen, 1974 0.939
Krashen, Houck, et al., 1977 0.779
for n = 8, significance at 0.05 level requires rho = 0.643 or larger.
significance at 0.01 level requires rho = 0.833 or larger.
(continued)
_________________________________________________________________________
individual and grouped studies of second language performers. Admittedly, it is not a rigidly invariant order, as shown in Fig. 1. It is also far from random, however.
The task is far from complete in this area. As indicated in Table 1, more data should be gathered for adults longitudinally, and the effect of monitoring on the morpheme order deserves replication.